Bureau of Land Management near Tucson and Phoenix have initiated public scoping for the Middle Gila South Access and Transportation Plan. This is located near small towns and communities in Pinal, Pima, Cochise, and Gila counties, and includes approximately 725 miles of existing undesignated access routes.
There is already congressionally designated Wilderness such as White Canyon Wilderness and other restrictive areas within and surrounding the project area such as the Tonto National Forest. Over 700 miles of trails are used by a wide variety of recreation users. There also appears to be many trails that are missing from the inventory. It is during this scoping period of the process that it is most advantageous to share missing routes with the BLM.
BLM is in an “inventory” phase where they are addressing access needs and the purpose and need for each mileage of trail. Specific knowledge of the area and trails will be crucial in this planning process. They have developed three preliminary alternatives in addition to Alternative A, which is current management where no mileage of trails are officially designated within the project area of 212,000 acres. You can compare the various alternatives in the below maps. Alternative D states that its focus is to consider access needs and reduce user conflicts and resource impacts. Often times user conflicts aren’t properly defined, reported or documented but simply non-motorized groups complaining about motorized users. BLM is obligated to not favor one user group over another.
Alternative A-No change
Alternative D-all trails open, no maintenance on OHV trails
There is currently an issue of locked gates closing off access to users. This needs to be addressed as the BLM creates the official alternatives.
Alternative D states, “Under Alternative D, existing routes with limited function would be designated open to OHV use but not maintained. New access routes would be constructed to bypass locked gates blocking public access to existing route networks.”
Please submit a comment to the BLM to let them know that a modified Alternative D needs to be selected in order to accommodate use in the area and mitigate impacts.