AZBackroads.com

Motorized Access Workshop

  • Home
  • News
  • Take Action
  • Store
  • LibraryReading room to find content from partner organizations.
  • Backcountry
    • Arizona 4×4 Routes
    • Fire Restrictions in Arizona
    • Wildfires in Arizona
    • Forest Alerts
  • About
    • About Us
    • Connect With Us

Chapter #8

Revised Statute 2477 & The Public Forum

Roads are fundamental to Free Speech communication

Roads, since the beginning of time, have been used by the public for free speech communication, peaceful assembly, and are considered part of the public forum. They are public spaces that provide the safety and security of free thought and allow the individual to safely parade without fear of persecution.

Roads are like any other public place which inherit the protections of Public Forum Doctrine. Under the Public Forum Doctrine, as described by many Supreme Court rulings, public roads and streets are considered Traditional Public Forums that provide an easement for free speech communication. When determining if free speech protections apply to a given property the court questions whether “a traditional right of access . . . comparable to that recognized for public streets and parks” applies. See Members of City Council of City of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 814 (1984), and The Concept of the Public Forum: Cox v. Louisiana, 1965 Sup. Ct. Rev. 1, 13 (1965).

“Wherever the title of streets and parks may rest, they have immemorially been held in trust for the use of the public and, time out of mind, have been used for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions. Such use of the streets and public places has, from ancient times, been a part of the privileges, immunities, rights, and liberties of citizens.”

Hague V. CIO 307 U.S. 496, 515 (1939)

“As regulation of the use of the streets for parades and processions is a traditional exercise of control by local government, the question in a particular case is whether that control is exerted so as not to deny or unwarrantedly abridge the right of assembly and the opportunities for the communication of thought and the discussion of public questions immemorially associated with resort to public places.”

312 U.S. 569, 574 (1941)

Similarly, in Schneider v. State of New Jersey, Town of Irvington, the Court had said that “the streets are natural and proper places for the dissemination of information and opinion.” 308 U.S. 147, 163 (1939)

Move to the next page to learn about Revised Statute 2477 rights of way and Federal Legislative Jurisdiction.

Last Page
Next Page

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Important RS 2477 Documents

Mining Act of 1865

1865 – The Mining Act of 1865 is written and introduced by Senator William M. Stewart from Nevada.

Senate Bill 16 – Proposed Amendment to the Mining Act of 1865

1870 – An amendment is proposed to grant special rights for the Sutro Tunnel in Nevada.

Senate Bill 16 – Statements of Fact from Senator Stewart

1870 – The founder of The Mining Act of 1865 opposes the proposed amendment and provides valuable insight into the legislative intent of RS 2477.

Federal Land Policy Management Act (FLPMA)

1976 – The Federal Land Policy Management Act, otherwise known as the BLM Organic Act, established the Bureau of Land Management multiple use mandate and repealed the Mining Act of 1865.

RS 2477 Settlement Act

1995 – The RS 2477 Settlement Act was introduced to settle disputes between the states and the Federal Government concerning RS 2477 roads, but failed to become law.

Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997

1992-1997 – The US Congress include prohibitions in the annual Appropriations Act to prohibit federal agencies from establishing any rule or regulation pertaining to the validity, recognition or management of RS 2477 rights-of-way without the express authorization of the US Congress.

Comptroller General Decision B-277719

1997 – The Comptroller General issued an opinion that made section 108 of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act permanent law.

Government Accounting Office Opinion B-300912

2003 – The Government Accounting Office issued a second opinion re-enforcing Decision B-277719 concerning a memorandum of understanding between the State of Utah and the Bureau of Land Management.

Accepting

  • About Us
  • Connect With Us
  • Take Action Now
  • Privacy & Return Policy

The Backcountry

  • Arizona 4×4 Routes
  • THE Guide to Camping
  • Trail Etiquette
  • Current wildfires in Arizona
  • Current fire Restrictions in Arizona
  • Forest Alerts
  • AZ State Trust Land Permit
Arizona Backcountry Explorers Logo

This website is built and maintained by Kevin Allard. All content on this website is protected by copyright and shall not be redistributed without written permission from the author. The Arizona Backcountry Explorers and AZBackroads.com names and logos are registered trademarks of Kevin Allard. The names and logos of our partners, affiliates, and syndicates are registered trademarks of their respective owners.

Keep Arizona’s backroads open

AZBackroads is independent media. We document road closures and help motorized users engage the agencies making those decisions.

This work is 100% funded by supporters. If the maps, policy alerts, and advocacy are useful to you, a membership starts at $10/month.

Become a supporter