Bureau of Land Management Road Closures | How it all started

Prior to the 1970s, motorized public land users mainly consisted of Motorcycles, Jeeps, snowmobiles, minibikes, go-carts, and Volkswagons. At this time, public land users were granted the fundamental right to construct “highways” under Section 8 of the Mining Act of 1866, otherwise known as Revised Statute 2477. Motorized users could travel across virgin soil, in any direction they pleased, to construct highways over public lands that were not reserved for public use. As a result, most of the roads we use to explore public lands today were created.

This practice persisted from 1866 until February 8th, 1972 when then-president Richard Nixon issued Executive Order 11644 to quell what the administration called “Unregulated Off-Highway Vehicle use.” The Executive Order demands federal agencies regulate cross-country travel and establish a “system of areas and trails” designated as open, closed, or limited to “off-road vehicle” use. The Executive Order, to this day, furnishes the only legal definition of “off-road vehicle” as “any motorized vehicle designed for or capable of cross-country travel on or immediately over land, water, sand, snow, ice, marsh, swampland, or other natural terrain.”

In response to Executive order 11644, the US Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management established agency regulations regarding the governance of cross-country travel on public lands. They each developed policy to designate geographical areas where motorized users are allowed to travel cross country with certain exemptions.

In 1976, the Mining Act of 1866 was repealed by the Federal Land Policy Management Act which Is known as the Bureau’s charter and multiple-use mandate that emphasizes retaining federal ownership of public land. Although the Mining Act was repealed, the Act makes the Bureau’s actions subject to all valid existing rights. Including Revised Statute 2477 rights of way.

The next year, executive order 11644 was amended by Executive Order 11989 from president Jimmy Carter to include Section 9. Section 9 directs the agency head to immediately close trails and areas to the type of offroad vehicle they determine causes or will cause “considerable adverse effects on the soil, vegetation, wildlife, wildlife habitat or cultural or historic resources of particular areas.”

In general, federal land management agencies designated geographical areas in one of three categories as described below.

By the year 1999, thousands of miles of road were closed on a case-by-case basis with a vast majority of public lands closed or limited to cross-country travel. At the time OHV designations consisted of 94,958,435 acres of public land open to cross-country travel; 10,570,171 acres closed; 126,276,664 acres limited; and 26,441,557 acres Undesignated.

Managing the movement of people on public lands

This is when the federal government’s attempt to manage the movement of people on public lands started to take hold. As you can imagine, Executive Order 11644 was a massive change to the traditions practiced by generations of public land users. It has taken decades to make this transition and convince motorized users to stay on existing roads.

Driving off established roads is frowned upon by most of the 4×4 and motorized user community. Because of this sentiment, motorized users, especially the older crowd, believe that closures are the result of individuals violating this principle.

During the rule-making process for implementing the provisions of Executive Order 11644 as amended, anti-access groups wanted the Bureau to restrict Off-Highway Vehicles to designated roads. The Bureau of Land Management asserted Executive Order 11644 never intended to limit motorized use of roads and explicitly rejected the idea referring to it as “more restrictive.”

“There were many suggestions to establish criteria that would confine off-road vehicles to designated roads and trails. Executive Order 11644 provides for the designation of “areas and trails” rather than the more restrictive “roads and trails” … Numerous comments wanted the regulations to control hunting, firearms and registration as they relate to off-road vehicles. These are activities in which the States have traditionally established standards of control, and there is no intent to interfere in this function. Standards of control in these regulations have been limited to situations where the States either have no controls, or their controls may be considered insufficient for off-road vehicle activities on public lands.”

44FR 34834 June 15, 1979

In response to the Government and Performance and Results Act of 1993, the Bureau of Land Management later released its 2000-2005 strategic plan that made OHV regulations a top priority for the Bureau. Under long-term goal 1.1.3 of the plan, the Bureau asserts, “the increased use of off-highway vehicles (OHVs) is leading to a crisis situation in some areas. Many public lands are either undesignated or open for OHV use.“

Simultaneously, in the year 2000, the Bureau developed the National Management Strategy for Motorized Off-Highway Vehicle Use on Public Lands and the National Mountain Bicycling Strategic Action Plan in 2001. To this day, you can find the Management Strategy referenced in the Bureau of Land Management employee policy 1626 manual as a technical reference to managing OHV issues. The Management Strategy is also used by the US Forest Service, National Park Service, and Bureau of Reclamation, and is even referenced by the US Forest Service while consulting with land management planning in foreign nations.

In 2003, the Bureau of Land Management released its Priorities for Recreation and Visitor Services where the Bureau officially made Travel Management Planning a long-term priority. In the new commitment to the public, the Bureau pledged to transform the management of public lands away from the “traditional activity-based approach to management.”

Part three of the plan lists BLMs priorities. Goal number one is to, “Improve Access to Appropriate Recreation Opportunities on Department of the Interior (DOI) Managed or Partnered Lands and Waters” with the objective to “establish a comprehensive approach to travel planning and management.”

In response to this, the Bureau revised federal regulations in 2002 implementing the Travel Management Rule. This new revision repealed multiple provisions in Title 43 Part 8340 referencing the historical grant issued under the Mining Act of 1865. These provisions specifically recognized the road as a property right of the state while applying state law.

Amendments

Bureau of Land Management regulations concerning Executive Order 11644 can be found in Title 43 Part 8340 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Multiple subparts of Part 8340 have been amended over the years. As a result, the original intent of Executive Order 11644 has been butchered by the Bureau.

Year	Changes
1979	Original Rule established by Executive Order 11644.
1980	Giving states jurisdiction over licensing requirements to operate an OHV.
1988	Revises the regulations in 43 CFR Part 8340 to clarify some definitions used in the existing regulations and simplify the designation process.
2002	Implements regulations concerning Recreation Use Permits, special events, and uses. This section also repealed provisions protecting RS 2477.
2020	Implemented provisions concerning e-bikes and removed the term “cross-country” from the definition of off-road vehicle.

Policy Manuals

These Policy Manuals direct Bureau employees while carrying out the Travel Management process. In these manuals, you will notice the application of RS 2477 and state law when governing roads on public lands.

Policy Manual
1626	Travel and Transportation Management Manual
2870	Grant Administration
2809	Special Considerations to Manuals 2801- 2807
2801	Rights-of-way – General

Read Title 43 Part 8340 as amended.

Below, you can read the Code of Federal Regulations concerning the Bureau’s Travel Management Policy.

It’s no longer the 1970s

The Bureau’s attempt to control travel on public lands has been ongoing for over 50 years and has morphed from regulations made at the local level, into a blanket regulation for all public lands from coast to coast.

It’s important for local clubs and motorized use advocates to remember that it’s now 2022. Land use is governed differently and the leadership in our community cannot use the same tactics to keep roads open. Although necessary, education alone is not sufficient enough to secure the motorized use of our public lands in the face of ever-changing policies.